Growth of Echinometra mathaei
Auximetric graph M vs K graph
M vs K graph
(loading of graphs may take 2-3 min.)

Main Ref. : 558     Data Ref. :2968
Data Type : length-frequencies 
Sex : unsexed 
L infinity (cm) : 4.1 TL 95% confidence limit:      
K (1/y) : 0.290   ELEFAN I n: r2: 95% confidence limit:      
to (y) : -0.01 95% confidence limit:  
Winf. : 31.30 g as given in Main Ref. or Ref. for growth   b used :3.000 Ø' : 0.69
C :  
M (1/y) : 0.290  M Ref. :2968   M doubtful? n: r2: 95% confidence limit:      
other method
Lm (cm) :     Unsexed   Lm Ref. :  
Locality : Not specified
Country :
Environment: open waters 
Temp. :         Temp. Ref. :  
Comment : M was computed from the value of Z, which is estimated from 2M or 2K, and b was assumed to be equal to 3. Linf in Ebert's notation was Sinf, referring to ambitus length or largest diameter. Growth estimates outlier in auximetric graph? Not checked.
Glossary
Comments & Corrections |